12/27/2022 0 Comments God of war betrayal how long to beatThere is a complete answer to that, and it rises in the minds of the great rank and file, and that answer is just this: We will never in this country tolerate any law that provides shackles for our people. Now, I interpret that to mean: If you are going to have an autocrat, take me, but be very careful about the other fellow. But in the hands of political puppets of an economic autocracy such power would provide shackles for the liberties of the people.” 1 In the hands of a people’s government this power is wholesome and proper. Just let me quote something from the President’s message to Congress: “In thirty-four months we have built up new instruments of public power. The next thing that I view as being dangerous to our national well-being is government by bureaucracy instead of what we have been taught to look for, government by law. I have met some good and bad financiers, but I have also met some good and bad laborers, and this I know, that permanent prosperity is dependent upon both capital and labor alike.Īnd I also know that there can be no permanent prosperity in this country until industry is able to employ labor, and there certainly can be no permanent recovery upon any governmental theory of soak the rich or soak the poor. In my time I have met some good and bad industrialists. It has been freely predicted that if we were ever to have civil strife again in this country, it would come from the appeal to passion and prejudices that comes from the demagogues that would incite one class of our people against the other. Now, what are these dangers that I see? The first is the arraignment of class against class. And when I see danger – I say “danger,” that is, the “Stop, look, and listen” to the fundamental principles upon which this Government of ours was organized – it is difficult for me to refrain from speaking up. But I can call upon innumerable witnesses to testify to the fact that during my whole public life I put patriotism above partisanship. It is not easy for me to stand up here tonight and talk to the American people against the Democratic Administration. I was attracted to it in my youth because I was led to believe that no man owned it, and furthermore that no group of men owned it, but, on the other hand, that it belonged to all the plain people in the United States. I was born in the Democratic Party and I expect to die in it. I have no feeling against any man, woman or child in the United States. There is nothing personal in this whole performance so far as I am concerned. I am not a candidate for any nomination by any party at any time, and what is more I do not intend to even lift my right hand to secure any nomination from any party at any time.įurther than that I have no axe to grind. Smith at the American Liberty League Dinner, Washington, D.C., January 25, 1936, Jouett Shouse Collection, (American Liberty League Pamphlets), Kentucky Digital Library, University of Kentucky.Īt the outset of my remarks let me make one thing perfectly clear. Source: “The Facts in the Case,” Speech of Alfred E. In it he accused President Roosevelt of ignoring the party platform of 1932 and flirting with a dangerous, un-American ideology. In January 1936, he gave the following address at a meeting of the organization at the Mayflower Hotel in Washington, DC. One of the most prominent members of the American Liberty League was Al Smith (1873–1944), formerly governor of New York and the Democratic Party’s candidate for president in 1928. It was never a particularly large group – at its height in mid-1936 it had approximately 125,000 members nationwide – but because so many of its leading figures were wealthy it had little problem getting its message out. In August 1934, a bipartisan group of businessmen and political leaders formed an organization called the American Liberty League, dedicated to fighting what it believed to be the radicalism of the New Deal. It is worth remembering that there was little ideological cohesion in either of the major parties – both had members ranging from the very conservative to the very liberal. The unprecedented nature of the New Deal guaranteed that it would generate a great deal of opposition among conservatives, including those within the Democratic Party.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |